top of page

Mangal Pandey was an Indian soldier in the pre-independence era.

Mangal Pandey

Conceived: July 19, 1827: Martyrdom: 8 April 1857 Successes: Mangal Pandey, a sepoy employed by the British East India Company, attacked senior British officers in an incident that is now known as the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857 or India's First War of Independence. This incident cemented his place in Indian history. This was due to the rumor that cow and pig fat was used to grease the cartridges used by Indian sepoys.

Mangal Pandey was an Indian soldier in the pre-independence era. His name is frequently preceded by Shaheed, which means "martyr" in Hindi. An individual from the 34th Regiment of the Bengal local infantry of the East India Organization, Mangal Pandey is considered as a part of the most famous figures related with India's opportunity battle in present times. He was born on July 19th, 1827, in the village of Nagwa in the state of Uttar Pradesh's Ballia district. There are still families in this village that claim to be Mangal Pandey's descendants.

However, there are some disagreements regarding the precise location of Mangal Pandey's birth. So read on to find out about the history of Mangal Pandey, who joined the sepoy power of the English East India Organization in the year 1849 at 22 years old. His name got scratched into the pages of the Indian history after he went after his senior English officials in an episode, which is today called the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857 or the India's Most memorable Conflict of Autonomy. He was then taken into custody and hung to death on April 8, 1857.

More information about Mangal Pandey's life can be found here. He was a devoted Hindu who strictly followed his religion. There was a rumor that the Indian sepoys' Enfield P-53 cartridge, which they were using, was greased with pig and cow fat. These cartridges had to be bit off to remove the cover before use, which was against Muslims' and Hindus' religious beliefs. Most people thought that the British had done this on purpose to hurt Indian feelings. What's more, this was the primary purpose for the explosion of Pandey's displeasure.

Biography: Mangal Pandey was an Indian soldier who was born on July 19, 1827, in Akbarpur, India, and died on April 8, 1857, in Barrackpore. His attack on British officers on March 29, 1857, was the first major incident of the Indian, or Sepoy Mutiny, which is also known as the First War of Independence or other names that are similar in India. We will investigate Mangal Pandey in depth in this article. Who was Mangal Pandey?From here, we'll concentrate on who was Mangal Pandey and what he did. Although some sources claim that Pandey was born in a small village near Lalitpur (present-day southwestern Uttar Pradesh), he was actually born in a town near Faizabad, which is now the state of eastern Uttar Pradesh in northern India. He belonged to a high-caste Brahman family that owned land and held fervent Hindu beliefs. According to a few sources, Pandey joined the British East India Company's army in 1849 after being recruited by a brigade that passed him. As a soldier (sepoy), he joined the 34th Bengal Native Infantry's 6th Company, which was made up of many Brahmans. Pandey had a lot of ambition, and he saw his work as a spy as a way to get to bigger and better things. However, Pandey's religious beliefs and professional goals were at odds. A new Enfield rifle was introduced into India in the middle of the 1850s, and he was stationed at the Barrackpore garrison at the time. This rifle let soldiers load it by biting off the ends of greased cartridges. There was a rumor that either cow or pig lard, which Hindus and Muslims detested, was used as the lubricant. The secoys came to believe that the British had purposefully coated the cartridges in lard. There are many ways to define the events of March 29, 1857. Pandey attempted to incite his individual sepoys to ascend against their English officials, attacked two of them, endeavored to shoot himself in the wake of being controlled, and was eventually wrecked and captured, as per the well known arrangement. Mangal Pandey was held tight eighth April 1857 as he was before long attempted and condemned to death. His hanging was initially scheduled for April 18, but British authorities postponed it until April 8 because they feared a widespread uprising if they waited until then. Later that month, an uprising in Meerut against the use of Enfield cartridges sparked the larger insurgency that began in May. Pandey is remembered in India as a freedom fighter who fought against British rule. His portrait was featured on a commemorative postage stamp that was issued by the Indian government in 1984.

In addition, his life was the subject of a 2005 film and stage play. Mangal Pandey joined the Bengal Army in 1849, marking the beginning of his attacks. As a private soldier (sepoy), he joined the 5th Company of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry in March 1857. On the afternoon of March 29, 1857, Lieutenant Baugh, Adjutant of the 34th Bengal Native Infantry at the time stationed at Barrackpore, was informed that numerous regiment members were in an agitated state. In addition, he was informed that Mangal Pandey, one of them, was pacing near the parade ground in front of the regiment's guardroom with a loaded musket, encouraging the men to revolt and threatening to shoot the first European he saw. According to testimony provided at a subsequent inquiry, Pandey had taken his guns and fled to the quarter-guard building when he discovered that a group of British soldiers were getting off a steamer near the cantonment. Pandey had been agitated by the sepoys' discontent and intoxicated by the drug bhang. Baugh quickly armed himself and rode his horse to the lines. Pandey took up position behind the station weapon before the 34th's quarter-watch, focused on Baugh, and discharged. The bullet missed Baugh, but it struck his horse in the flank, killing the rider as well as the horse. Baugh quickly untangled himself, grabbed one of his pistols, and fired at Pandey as he charged him. He was not successful. Before the adjutant could draw his sword, Pandey struck Baugh with a talwar, a heavy Indian sword, stabbed him in the shoulder and leg, and then knocked him to the ground. Another sepoy, Shaikh Paltu, got involved and tried to control Pandey as he tried to reload his gun. Hewson, a British Sergeant-Major, had been summoned to the parade ground by a native general prior to Baugh. He had instructed Indian officer Jemadar Ishwari Prasad, who was in charge of the quarter-guard, to detain Pandey. The jemadar's response was that he couldn't take Pandey on his own because his NCOs had gone looking for help. Ishwari Prasad was given the order to enter the guard with loaded weapons as a retaliation by Hewson. In the meantime, Baugh had arrived at the scene and yelled, "Where is he?" Where has he gone?' ' Hewson replied to Baugh, "Ride to the right for your life." The security guard will fire! After that, Pandey fired. Hewson charged Pandey while engaged in combat with Lieutenant Baugh. Hewson was being questioned when he was knocked to the ground from behind by a blow from Pandey's musket. The sound of gunfire had prompted other sepoys to leave the barracks, but they remained silent spectators. As of now, Shaikh Paltu, who was endeavoring to safeguard the two Brits, requested help from the other sepoys. Shaikh Paltu, who was being attacked by sepoys who threw stones and shoes at his back, asked the guard for help holding Pandey, but they said they would shoot him if he didn't. The sepoys of the quarter-guard then advanced and attacked the two officers who were lying down. They then made threats against Shaikh Paltu and pleaded with him to free Pandey, whom he had unsuccessfully attempted to keep in custody. Pandey, on the other hand, was held back by Paltu until Baugh and the sergeant-major could stand. With his wound, Paltu was forced to let go of his grip. He retreated in one direction and Baugh and Hewson in the other after being struck by the guards' muskets' butt ends. General Hearsey, the commanding officer, galloped to the field with his two officer sons after receiving a warning about the incident. After taking in the scene, he went up to the guards, drew his gun, and told them to catch Mangal Pandey so they could do their job. The first man who disobeyed the general was threatened with death. Hearsey was followed to Pandey by the men of the quarter-guard, who rushed in behind him. After that, Pandey fired the weapon by pressing the musket's muzzle against his chest and pulling the trigger with his foot. He had extensive bleeding and a fire in his regimental jacket, but he was not killed. Within less than a week, Pandey was put on trial and fully recovered.

He stated categorically that he had mutinied on his own initiative and that no one had encouraged him when asked if he had been under the influence of any drugs. He and Jemadar Ishwari Prasad were given the death penalty by hanging after three Sikh quarter-guard members testified that Pandey had told them not to arrest him. AftermathAfter an administration request, the 34th B.N.I. The regiment was disbanded "with disgrace" on 6 May as an aggregate discipline for neglecting to satisfy their obligation in limiting a mutinous trooper and his official. After a six-week period in which Calcutta considered requests for leniency, this occurred. Sepoy Shaikh Paltu was assassinated in a remote area of the Barrackpore cantonment just before the regiment was disbanded, but he was given the rank of havildar (sergeant) on March 29 for his actions. According to Indian historian Surendra Nath Sen, the 34th B.N.I. had a strong recent record, and the Court of Enquiry had found no evidence of a connection with the 19th B.N.I.'s unrest at Berhampore four weeks earlier (see below). However, British military authorities were persuaded that the regiment as a whole was untrustworthy by Mangal Pandey's behavior as well as the hesitation of the quarter-armed guards and on-duty sepoys to act. Pandey seems to have acted without first acquiring the certainty of other sepoys, however the regiment's hostility against its English officials had driven a large portion of those present to act as observers as opposed to follow orders. Inspiration and Story of Another Type of Projectile Cartridge in DetailMangal Pandey's own thought process in his activities stays a secret. " Emerge - the Europeans are here," he shouted to other sepoys during the episode, "from gnawing these cartridges we will become unbelievers," and "you sent me around here, how about you go along with me." At his court martial, he said that he had been using bhang and opium and didn't know what he was doing on March 29. In the months before the Barrackpore incident, the Bengal Army was anxious and mistrustful for a variety of reasons. The reference to cartridges made by Pandey is by and large credited to another type of shot cartridge utilized in the Enfield P-53 rifle, which was to be presented in the Bengal Armed force that year. It was believed that the cartridge was greased with animal fat, mostly from cows and pigs, which Hindus and Muslims, respectively, could not eat. Cows were considered sacred to Hindus, while pigs were considered repugnant to Muslims. The cartridges needed to be bit at one end before being used. Some Indian soldiers in some regiments believed that the British had purposefully defiled their religions. Colonel S. Wheeler of the 34th B.N.I. was an ardent and devoted Christian. The wife of Captain William Halliday of the 56th B.N.I. distributed the Bible to the sepoys in Urdu and Hindi, casting doubt on their belief that the British were attempting to convert them to Christianity. The 19th and 34th Bengal Native Infantry were stationed at Lucknow during the annexation of Oudh in 1856 due to suspicions of mismanagement by the Nawab. The annexation had negative effects on the sepoys of the Bengal Army, many of whom came from that princely state. These sepoys reserved the option to request of the English Occupant at Lucknow for equity before the extension, which was a significant honor in the feeling of local courts. Because Oudh no longer functioned as a political entity that was at least nominally independent, they lost their special status as a result of the actions of the East India Company. The nineteenth B.N.I. is critical in light of the fact that, on February 26, 1857, it was the regiment entrusted with testing the new cartridges. However, prior to the mutiny, they had not been given brand-new rifles, and the cartridges in the regiment's magazine were as grease-free as they had ever been. There were suspicions raised because the cartridges were wrapped in paper of a different color.

The non-commissioned officers of the regiment rejected the cartridges on February 26. The commanding officer, Colonel William Mitchell, was informed of this information and took it upon himself to convince the sailors that they did not need to bite the cartridges because they were identical to those they were accustomed to. He pleaded with the native officers to uphold the regiment's honor at the conclusion of his speech and threatened to court-martial any sepoys who refused to accept the cartridge. On the other hand, the sepoys of the regiment took their bell of arms the next morning (from the weapons store). Mitchell's ensuing accommodative way of behaving convinced the sepoys to get back to their sleeping enclosure. Court of EnquiryA Court of Enquiry was gathered, and following an almost extended survey, the nineteenth B.N.I. was prescribed to be disbanded. The same procedure was followed on March 31. The government gave the 19th B.N.I. permission to return to their homes and allowed them to keep their uniforms. After the incident on March 29, both Colonel Wheeler of Pandey's 34th B.N.I. and Colonel Mitchell of the 19th B.N.I. were deemed unfit to command any new regiments that were formed to replace the units that had been disbanded. Consequences Most people believe that the Indian Rebellion of 1857 began with Panday's assault and subsequent punishment. It is believed that one of the factors that sparked the general series of mutinies that erupted over the course of the subsequent few months was the fact that his actions were well-known among his fellow sepoys. V.D. Savarkar, who viewed Mangal Pandey's motivation as one of the earliest manifestations of Indian Nationalism, was influenced by Mangal Pandey. Modern Indian nationalists portray Pandey as the mastermind behind a plot to revolt against the British, despite the fact that a recently published study of events immediately preceding the outbreak suggests that "there is no historical evidence to back up any of these revisionist interpretations." During the subsequent uprising, British soldiers and civilians began using the derogatory term "Pandee" or "Pandey" to refer to a mutinous Sepoy. Mangal Pandey's name was directly derived from this. Death On March 29, 1857, Pandey was agitatedly pacing in front of the guard room of the regiment. He was yelling at his fellow sepoys and gave the impression of being overjoyed. He threatened to shoot the first European he saw that day with a loaded musket. He yelled to the other soldiers, "Come out, the Europeans are here, and by biting these cartridges, we will become infidels." After learning of Pandey's actions, Sergeant-Major James Hewson arrived on the scene. He asked Indian officer Jemadar Ishwari Prasad to arrest Pandey, but Prasad said he couldn't do it on his own and refused. Lieutenant Henry Baugh, the Sergeant-Significant's assistant, showed up on a pony and was shot at by Pandey - this is known as the primary discharge at a British bloke during the Revolt of 1857. Pandey struck his horse instead, missing the lieutenant. Pandey was engaging Baugh after this when Hewson moved toward him. He was knocked out by the blow. No soldiers came forward to assist the officers during the ordeal. Shaikh Paltu, a single soldier, made an effort to assist the English. Paltu was stoned and attacked by other Sepoys for attempting to assist the Englishmen. At the point when different troopers took steps to shoot him in the event that he didn't relinquish the mutinous sepoy, Paltu snatched him. 

 In the meantime, two officers and the commanding officer, General Hearsey, arrived on the scene. After failing to invite all of the men to start a revolt, Pandey tried to kill himself with his musket. Be that as it may, he just hurt himself and was captured subsequently. In less than a week, Mangal Pandey was tried and given the death penalty by hanging. During his preliminary, he said that he mutinied willingly and that no other sepoy energized him. Jemadar Ishwari Prasad received the death penalty by hanging as well because he had advised the other soldiers not to arrest Pandey. According to the verdict, Pandey was put to death on April 8, 1857, and Prasad was put to death on April 21. On May 6, the 34th Regiment of the BNI as a whole was disbanded "with disgrace." After an investigation revealed that the soldiers had failed to contain a mutinous soldier, this was done.

Frequently Asked Questions: Who was Mangal Pandey?

Mangal Pandey was an Indian fighter who had a critical impact in the occasions promptly going before the episode of the Indian resistance of 1857. He served as a spy for the British East India Company in the 34th Bengal Native Infantry regiment. In 1984, the Indian government provided a postage stamp to recollect him.

What has earned Mangal Pandey fame?

Mangal Pandey, an Indian soldier who was born on July 19, 1827, in Akbarpur, India, and passed away on April 8, 1857, in Barrackpore, was the first major incident of what became known as the Indian, or Sepoy, Mutiny. In India, the uprising is sometimes referred to as the First War of Independence or something else.

Why was Mangal Pandey killed by hanging?

At Barrackpore close to Kolkata on 29 Walk 1857, Pandey went after and harmed his English sergeant, other than injuring an assistant. He was captured and condemned to death. He was put to death on April 8, 1857.

Who did Mangal Pandey shoot?

Pandey fired at Lieutenant Henry Baugh, the Sergeant-Major's adjutant, as he arrived on horseback; this is regarded as the first gunshot fired at an Englishman during the Revolt of 1857. Pandey hit his horse rather than the lieutenant because he missed hitting him.

Did Mangal Pandey act heroically?

Pandey, a brave sepoy and revolutionary soldier, was a key player in India's first rebellion in 1857 against British rule. He is regarded as a hero of the first war of independence, also known as the Sepoy Mutiny of 1857, which helped Indians realize their dream of independence.

Who was India's first freedom fighter?

The first Indian freedom fighter was Mangal Pandey. He introduced the phrase "Maro Firangi Ko" to Indians for the first time, inspiring them. The initial struggle for liberation was sparked by his uprising.

How accurate is Mangal Pandey?

However, he was deified by Bollywood in an Aamir Khan starrer Mangal Pandey: The Ascension Although the filmmakers failed to accurately portray historical events, their attempt to reenact the life of a sepoy trying to resist British rule was admirable. The film attempted to combine folklore and history.

Who was Mangal Pandey's closest friend?

Seeing the execution is Pandey's companion, Skipper William Gordon (Toby Stephens), who is feeling quite a bit better when the execution is deferred because of the executioner's refusal to hang Pandey. The film then, at that point, streaks back to four years sooner.

Who was the initial 1857 freedom fighter?

Mangal Pandey is widely regarded as the catalyst for the revolt. The British executed Pandey in 1857. He is thought to have been one of the first people to fight for freedom during the 1857 Revolt.

33 views0 comments

Recent Posts

See All
Post: Blog2 Post
bottom of page